PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.86%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-13.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-64.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-64.58%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-64.29%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.98%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.59%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.13%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
64.89%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1672.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 2837.98%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
447.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 154.52%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
183.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 50.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2218.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 2218.77% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
558.24%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
216.11%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
795.97%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
245.43%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
42.07%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
369.73%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 307.92%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
85.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 96.96%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.66%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.48%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.83%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.86%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.74%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1342.00%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 9.30%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.18%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
76.71%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 1.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.