PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.00%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 9.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
10.75%
Gross profit growth similar to BIDU's 9.97%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
4.89%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 124.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.89%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 124.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
7.70%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 837.61%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.24%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 823.40%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.06%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 797.87%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.60%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.45%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 319.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.94%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 527.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1511.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 2269.64%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
425.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 119.98%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
165.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 42.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
5605.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 5605.55% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
482.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 482.17% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
172.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 172.88% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
831.23%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 521.69% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
200.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
16.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
338.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 273.73%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
78.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 93.19%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.03%
AR growth well above BIDU's 14.41%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
Positive asset growth while BIDU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.99%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.40%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
8.32%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 2.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
15.91%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 13.63%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-7.33%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.