PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.43%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
21.34%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 14.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
23.28%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 97.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
23.28%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 97.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
20.65%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 199.56%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
21.13%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 200.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
20.75%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 199.56%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.31%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.10%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.41%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 25.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.71%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 25.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1498.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 253673.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
434.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 108.59%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
144.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 59.17%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1427.15%
OCF/share CAGR of 1427.15% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
460.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 460.10% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
88.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 88.51% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1986.63%
Below 50% of BIDU's 69510.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
930.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 99.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
111.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 54.22%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1668.76%
Below 50% of BIDU's 3338.07%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
173.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 222.17%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
74.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 77.95%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.05%
AR growth well above BIDU's 47.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.20%
Positive asset growth while BIDU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.84%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.69%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
13.05%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
9.27%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 1.41%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
28.99%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.