PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.36%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 15.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.06%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 64.16%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.19%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 933.87%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.19%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 933.87%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
5.63%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 8629.27%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
5.81%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 8500.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 8500.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.35%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.38%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.75%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 272.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-91.63%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 344.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1682.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 1276.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
355.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 60.57%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
105.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 25.82%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2466.59%
OCF/share CAGR of 2466.59% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
103.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 103.23% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-25.86%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU stands at 10.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1742.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 332.63% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
613.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
36.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with BIDU's 179.62%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
70.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 68.21%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.66%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.95%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 1.82%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.52%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.16%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.82%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 3.19%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
11.13%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 8.91%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.44%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 14.67%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.