PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.89%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 8.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.27%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 19.51%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
34.83%
EBIT growth 50-75% of BIDU's 68.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
34.83%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 68.94%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
51.53%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 282.17%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
51.10%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 289.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
50.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 285.27%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.50%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.56%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.43%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
885.39%
FCF growth above 1.5x BIDU's 6.16%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
1811.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 594.05%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
369.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 57.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
112.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 22.73%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1377.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 1377.74% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
341.54%
OCF/share CAGR of 341.54% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
63.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2836.32%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 646.18% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
767.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 393.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
70.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 75.70%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.91%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 222.11%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
68.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 65.13%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.23%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 3.37%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
6.07%
50-75% of BIDU's 8.12%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
0.80%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 0.30%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
6.75%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
0.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 6.41%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.