PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.10%
Revenue growth similar to BIDU's 11.43%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
12.54%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 17.67%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
8.69%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 24.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.69%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 24.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.45%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
9.88%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.39%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.03%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 3.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.10%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.20%
OCF growth under 50% of BIDU's 92.76%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.33%
FCF growth under 50% of BIDU's 207.79%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
2673.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 820.98%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
357.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 71.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
123.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 21.33%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
8665.64%
OCF/share CAGR of 8665.64% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
319.24%
OCF/share CAGR of 319.24% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
114.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 114.16% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
3597.09%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
362.24%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
107.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with BIDU's 168.54%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
77.34%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 54.33%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.84%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 32.82%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.33%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.62%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.45%
Positive BV/share change while BIDU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.38%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 7.89%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
17.30%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 23.24%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
16.80%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 8.81%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.