PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.07%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
17.57%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
20.74%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
20.74%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
11.87%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 110.36%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
13.76%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 109.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 109.39%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-2.04%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.10%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.48%
OCF growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 40.51%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
30.23%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2514.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 642.89%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
300.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 81.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
105.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 22.23%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3016.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 41.03%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
284.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 284.75% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
143.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2890.34%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
202.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
54.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2138.24%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 1289.09%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
121.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with BIDU's 128.92%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
53.16%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 30.41%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.14%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 53.65%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.12%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.41%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
9.75%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
11.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 19.83%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
18.34%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.