PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.12%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-19.84%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-32.27%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 32.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-32.27%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 32.84%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-27.42%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-26.34%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-26.09%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.58%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.04%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.25%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-32.19%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1969.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 572.71%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
274.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 68.92%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
94.11%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 19.07%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2404.37%
OCF/share CAGR of 2404.37% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
200.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
58.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 13.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2757.16%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
163.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
222.29%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1627.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 1143.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
113.73%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 126.39%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
49.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 30.93%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.87%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.07%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.29%
1.25-1.5x BIDU's 1.04%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
1.30%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 0.08%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
9.38%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-26.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.