PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.84%
Negative revenue growth while BIDU stands at 9.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.91%
Negative gross profit growth while BIDU is at 12.37%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-32.23%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 56.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-32.23%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 56.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.28%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-33.60%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.81%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.96%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.55%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 13.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-93.17%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 18.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1881.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 421.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
195.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 37.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
68.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 15.61%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3397.72%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 131.71%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
74.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
11.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
6821.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-22.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while BIDU is 94.35%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
689.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 839.01%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
91.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with BIDU's 98.31%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
41.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 37.08%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.59%
Firm’s AR is declining while BIDU shows 31.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.37%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.02%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
61.20%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
5.52%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.84%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 8.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.