PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.06%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
8.32%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
94.39%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
94.39%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
5.87%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 1472.02%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.32%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 1423.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.32%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 1407.69%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.64%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.75%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.74%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1630.38%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1946.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 423.61%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
177.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 40.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
65.65%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 13.61%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2049.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 180.31%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
111.80%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
73.46%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
10814.15%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 77.69% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
22.05%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 18.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-31.26%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
978.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 760.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
89.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with BIDU's 93.31%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
35.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 35.52%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.94%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 45.19%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.50%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.99%
Similar to BIDU's 3.08%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
2.67%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
6.55%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.91%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 13.25%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.