PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.47%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.04%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.10%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.10%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.01%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
21.33%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
21.41%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.39%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.42%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.89%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.30%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 16.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1437.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 265.59%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
166.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 27.64%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
60.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 10.73%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1462.36%
OCF/share CAGR of 1462.36% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
184.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 18.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
55.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 68.91%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
2571.77%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
129.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 24.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
40.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
881.35%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 531.57%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
104.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 48.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
34.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 27.85%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.92%
AR growth well above BIDU's 6.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.17%
Positive asset growth while BIDU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.62%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.80%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2.81%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
13.81%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 3.05%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.48%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 1.32%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.