PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.11%
Negative revenue growth while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.02%
Negative gross profit growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-21.19%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.19%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.76%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.99%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.19%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
9.43%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1386.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 267.88%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
171.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 44.54%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
57.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 19.27%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1428.23%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 72.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
132.17%
Below 50% of BIDU's 273.58%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
77.78%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 45.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1875.09%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 2.47% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
471.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 892.91%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
47.28%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
811.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 516.05%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
94.07%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 51.02%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
26.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 3.61%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Negative asset growth while BIDU invests at 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.57%
We have a declining book value while BIDU shows 2.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.07%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 5.68%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-5.13%
Our R&D shrinks while BIDU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
9.14%
SG&A growth of 9.14% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.