PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.21%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
19.06%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
32.02%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
34.66%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
32.83%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
32.58%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
32.17%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.20%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.54%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.36%
Dividend growth of 0.36% while BIDU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
13.20%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-17.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1286.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 145.72%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
159.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 17.80%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
58.62%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 3.32%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1850.78%
OCF/share CAGR of 1850.78% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
248.29%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
70.65%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
3203.43%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 62.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
220.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
123.64%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of BIDU's 203.29%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
458.27%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with BIDU's 417.62%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
104.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 60.67%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
61.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 24.89%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.61%
AR growth well above BIDU's 27.19%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.66%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.51%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.79%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.50%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 2.54%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
8.97%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 2.78%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-14.61%
We cut SG&A while BIDU invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.