PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-12.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.77%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 150.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.86%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 15.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.13%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 48.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.83%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 56.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.32%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 51.69%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.28%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.92%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
4.94%
Dividend growth of 4.94% while BIDU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-18.27%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1232.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 160.41%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
170.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 44.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
63.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 14.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1476.83%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
147.75%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
84.06%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
3548.30%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 221.72% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
285.17%
Below 50% of BIDU's 18824.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
140.43%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1133.54%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
450.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 404.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
99.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 66.34%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
61.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 27.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.51%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 6.13%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.59%
50-75% of BIDU's 3.17%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
0.94%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 28.65%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-0.25%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
25.86%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.