PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.45%
Negative revenue growth while GOOG stands at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-11.65%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-30.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-30.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.12%
Negative net income growth while GOOG stands at 6.88%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-23.23%
Negative EPS growth while GOOG is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-23.23%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GOOG is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-12.94%
Share reduction while GOOG is at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-16.35%
Reduced diluted shares while GOOG is at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-103.69%
Negative FCF growth while GOOG is at 3.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
66.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 17079.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
66.25%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 176.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
66.25%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GOOG's 87.26%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
46.83%
OCF/share CAGR of 46.83% while GOOG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
46.83%
Below 50% of GOOG's 188.01%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
46.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GOOG's 59.14%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
1.07%
Below 50% of GOOG's 24386.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1.07%
Below 50% of GOOG's 174.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
1.07%
Below 50% of GOOG's 96.82%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.88%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.47%
Asset growth above 1.5x GOOG's 6.30%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
31.24%
BV/share growth above 1.5x GOOG's 5.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
4.28%
Debt shrinking faster vs. GOOG's 29.76%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
23.39%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. GOOG's 10.76%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
15.96%
We expand SG&A while GOOG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.