PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.59%
Positive revenue growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
26.28%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x GOOG's 5.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
38.73%
EBIT growth above 1.5x GOOG's 25.26%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
38.73%
Operating income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 25.26%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
172.88%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 32.63%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
222.95%
EPS growth above 1.5x GOOG's 29.41%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
222.95%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GOOG's 37.50%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
9.95%
Share count expansion well above GOOG's 0.48%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.55%
Diluted share count expanding well above GOOG's 0.50%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.40%
OCF growth above 1.5x GOOG's 16.61%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
511.39%
FCF growth above 1.5x GOOG's 16.51%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
29.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 4936.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
29.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 158.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
29.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 90.72%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
23.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 23.26% while GOOG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
23.26%
Below 50% of GOOG's 160.21%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
23.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 64.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-86.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GOOG is at 4495.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-86.86%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GOOG is 125.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-86.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GOOG is 40.81%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
121.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 121.48% while GOOG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
121.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOG's 198.26%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
121.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 91.85%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.18%
Firm’s AR is declining while GOOG shows 9.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.83%
Negative asset growth while GOOG invests at 4.53%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-24.57%
We have a declining book value while GOOG shows 4.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
161.20%
We have some new debt while GOOG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
21.72%
We increase R&D while GOOG cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
15.05%
We expand SG&A while GOOG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.