743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.01%
Negative revenue growth while GOOG stands at 5.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-11.96%
Negative gross profit growth while GOOG is at 1.11%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-28.68%
Negative EBIT growth while GOOG is at 9.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-28.68%
Negative operating income growth while GOOG is at 9.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
404.65%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 15.94%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
200.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x GOOG's 13.64%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GOOG's 13.64%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-6.94%
Share reduction while GOOG is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.28%
Reduced diluted shares while GOOG is at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.58%
Positive OCF growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-18.84%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
97.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 4118.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
97.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOG's 155.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
97.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GOOG's 98.35%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
106.71%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 2317.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
106.71%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 93.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
106.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 35.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-7.63%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GOOG is at 9577.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-7.63%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GOOG is 142.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-7.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GOOG is 64.65%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while GOOG shows 0.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.40%
Asset growth well under 50% of GOOG's 3.09%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
8.08%
BV/share growth above 1.5x GOOG's 4.89%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-4.16%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-1.35%
Our R&D shrinks while GOOG invests at 4.49%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.27%
We expand SG&A while GOOG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.