PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.20%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GOOG's 5.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.94%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x GOOG's 5.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
25.85%
EBIT growth above 1.5x GOOG's 8.54%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
25.85%
Operating income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 8.54%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
27.49%
Positive net income growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
21.43%
Positive EPS growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.93%
Share count expansion well above GOOG's 0.34%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.04%
Diluted share count expanding well above GOOG's 0.27%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.14%
Negative OCF growth while GOOG is at 8.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-36.81%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
106.76%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 2823.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
106.76%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOG's 153.15%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
106.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 95.22%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
64.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 2877.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
64.51%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOG's 119.13%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
64.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to GOOG's 68.21%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
81.89%
Below 50% of GOOG's 11384.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
81.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOG's 116.87%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
81.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 30.89%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.51%
Our AR growth while GOOG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.03%
Negative asset growth while GOOG invests at 3.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.68%
Similar to GOOG's 4.89%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-73.47%
We’re deleveraging while GOOG stands at 5.17%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.27%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. GOOG's 1.51%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-8.60%
We cut SG&A while GOOG invests at 2.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.