PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.86%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-9.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.48%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.48%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
11.45%
Positive net income growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-3.64%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3.70%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.04%
Slight or no buybacks while GOOG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.94%
Diluted share count expanding well above GOOG's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.52%
OCF growth under 50% of GOOG's 19.38%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-13.30%
Negative FCF growth while GOOG is at 21.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
524.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GOOG's 666.76%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
524.61%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 120.99%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
215.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 39.42%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
633.53%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with GOOG's 692.06%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
633.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 125.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
254.86%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 102.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
530.63%
Similar net income/share CAGR to GOOG's 505.94%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
530.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 118.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
582.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 20.88%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
241.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 57.41%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.25%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.40%
Asset growth above 1.5x GOOG's 1.55%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x GOOG's 2.71%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
2.21%
We increase R&D while GOOG cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.29%
We expand SG&A while GOOG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.