743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.36%
Positive revenue growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.06%
Positive gross profit growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1.19%
Positive EBIT growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.19%
Positive operating income growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
5.63%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 1.80%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
5.81%
EPS growth above 1.5x GOOG's 2.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 4.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.35%
Slight or no buybacks while GOOG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.38%
Slight or no buyback while GOOG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.75%
Negative OCF growth while GOOG is at 22.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-91.63%
Negative FCF growth while GOOG is at 57.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1682.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 424.42%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
355.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 116.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
105.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 49.52%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2466.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 526.76%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
103.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to GOOG's 100.74%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-25.86%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GOOG stands at 91.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1742.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 253.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
613.49%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 77.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
36.41%
Below 50% of GOOG's 100.54%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 85.85%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
70.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 41.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.66%
Our AR growth while GOOG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.95%
Asset growth at 50-75% of GOOG's 1.86%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.52%
BV/share growth above 1.5x GOOG's 2.50%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.82%
We have some new debt while GOOG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
11.13%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. GOOG's 0.81%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.44%
We expand SG&A while GOOG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.