PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.07%
Revenue growth similar to GOOG's 15.67%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
17.57%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 12.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
20.74%
EBIT growth above 1.5x GOOG's 4.06%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
20.74%
Operating income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 4.06%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
11.87%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 9.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
13.76%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 9.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GOOG's 9.29%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-2.04%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.10%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.48%
Positive OCF growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
30.23%
Positive FCF growth while GOOG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2514.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 596.44%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
300.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 200.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
105.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GOOG's 101.22%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
3016.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 521.75%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
284.75%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 175.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
143.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 101.44%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
2890.34%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 646.97% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
202.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOG's 302.98%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
54.20%
Below 50% of GOOG's 142.04%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
2138.24%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 323.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
121.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 88.43%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
53.16%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to GOOG's 48.63%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.14%
AR growth well above GOOG's 12.94%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.12%
Negative asset growth while GOOG invests at 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.41%
We have a declining book value while GOOG shows 3.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
9.75%
Debt growth far above GOOG's 1.74%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
11.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. GOOG's 13.18%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
18.34%
SG&A growth well above GOOG's 33.88%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.