PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.94%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.42%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-28.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-28.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
22.70%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 10.47%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
25.57%
EPS growth above 1.5x GOOG's 11.32%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GOOG's 11.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.93%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.67%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
30.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x GOOG's 7.50%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
1780.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 416.67%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
172.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 143.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
78.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GOOG's 82.13%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
1763.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 569.23%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
102.70%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GOOG's 119.56%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
41.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GOOG's 120.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
2418.18%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 365.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
30.29%
Below 50% of GOOG's 74.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
29.05%
Below 50% of GOOG's 136.51%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
910.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 257.50%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
82.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with GOOG's 76.38%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
31.32%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of GOOG's 37.61%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.99%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Negative asset growth while GOOG invests at 1.16%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.23%
Under 50% of GOOG's 2.78%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
3.70%
We have some new debt while GOOG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-3.99%
Our R&D shrinks while GOOG invests at 11.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-22.59%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.