PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.11%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.02%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.19%
Negative EBIT growth while GOOG is at 7.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.19%
Negative operating income growth while GOOG is at 7.49%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.76%
Negative net income growth while GOOG stands at 14.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.99%
Negative EPS growth while GOOG is at 15.06%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GOOG is at 15.24%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.19%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.81%
Negative OCF growth while GOOG is at 52.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
9.43%
FCF growth under 50% of GOOG's 113.22%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1386.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 465.41%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
171.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 147.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
57.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GOOG's 57.77%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
1428.23%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 611.84%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
132.17%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GOOG's 169.11%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
77.78%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 62.20%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
1875.09%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 642.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
471.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 297.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
47.28%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to GOOG's 43.12%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
811.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOG's 245.98%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
94.07%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOG's 78.67%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
26.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOG's 38.08%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Negative asset growth while GOOG invests at 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.57%
We have a declining book value while GOOG shows 3.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.07%
We have some new debt while GOOG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-5.13%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
9.14%
We expand SG&A while GOOG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.