PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.84%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.91%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-32.23%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-32.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.28%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-33.60%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.81%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.96%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.55%
Negative OCF growth while GOOGL is at 20.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-93.17%
Negative FCF growth while GOOGL is at 27.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1881.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOGL's 394.18%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
195.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOGL's 165.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
68.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GOOGL's 81.87%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
3397.72%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOGL's 488.24%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
74.19%
Below 50% of GOOGL's 152.32%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
11.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GOOGL's 60.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
6821.46%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOGL's 544.72% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2.91%
Below 50% of GOOGL's 120.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-22.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GOOGL is 109.80%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
689.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOGL's 276.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
91.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOGL's 72.20%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
41.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to GOOGL's 38.68%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.37%
Asset growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 0.86%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.52%
We have a declining book value while GOOGL shows 0.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
61.20%
Debt growth far above GOOGL's 0.68%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
5.52%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. GOOGL's 4.39%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.84%
SG&A growth well above GOOGL's 2.32%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.