PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-12.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.77%
Negative EBIT growth while GOOGL is at 29.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.86%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.13%
Negative net income growth while GOOGL stands at 30.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.83%
Negative EPS growth while GOOGL is at 30.88%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.32%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GOOGL is at 30.70%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.28%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.92%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
4.94%
Dividend growth above 1.5x GOOGL's 0.04%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-18.27%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1232.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOGL's 484.45%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
170.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOGL's 147.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
63.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOGL's 43.78%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
1476.83%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOGL's 510.68%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
147.75%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOGL's 255.76%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
84.06%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOGL's 56.04%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
3548.30%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOGL's 998.41% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
285.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of GOOGL's 469.40%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
140.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to GOOGL's 127.74%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
450.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GOOGL's 255.88%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
99.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with GOOGL's 91.05%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
61.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GOOGL's 47.31%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.51%
Asset growth well under 50% of GOOGL's 5.58%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.59%
Under 50% of GOOGL's 6.60%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.94%
We have some new debt while GOOGL reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.25%
Our R&D shrinks while GOOGL invests at 3.35%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
25.86%
We expand SG&A while GOOGL cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.