PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.35%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 16.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
29.00%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 21.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
65.95%
Positive EBIT growth while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
65.95%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of PINS's 87.79%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
52.53%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
55.56%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 334.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
44.44%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 335.66%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.44%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
168.88%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
100.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 310.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
100.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 217.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
100.05%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 46.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
912.04%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 424.98%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
912.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 592.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
912.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 69.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
36.20%
Below 50% of PINS's 166.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
36.20%
Below 50% of PINS's 133.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
36.20%
Below 50% of PINS's 188.03%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.66%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.70%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.99%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-4.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.41%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
16.62%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 22.36%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.