PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.07%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PINS's 16.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
8.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 21.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.50%
Positive EBIT growth while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.50%
Operating income growth under 50% of PINS's 87.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.78%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.99%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.11%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-12.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
213.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 310.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
213.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PINS's 217.57%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
213.43%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 46.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
106.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 424.98%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
106.20%
Below 50% of PINS's 592.95%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
106.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 69.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
229.82%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 166.88%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
229.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 133.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
229.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 188.03%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.54%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
14.63%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-14.72%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
23.58%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
14.05%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 22.36%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.