PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.23%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 16.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
21.23%
Gross profit growth similar to PINS's 21.27%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-21.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.33%
Negative operating income growth while PINS is at 87.79%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-13.22%
Negative net income growth while PINS stands at 334.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.35%
Negative EPS growth while PINS is at 334.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-16.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PINS is at 335.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
6.27%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.51%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.84%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
39.16%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
199.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 310.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
199.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PINS's 217.57%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
199.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 46.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
172.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 424.98%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
172.66%
Below 50% of PINS's 592.95%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
172.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 69.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
102.44%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 166.88%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
102.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 133.35%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
102.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PINS's 188.03%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
547.22%
Equity/share CAGR of 547.22% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
547.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 118.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
547.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 50.13%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.11%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.13%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
59.93%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-16.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
82.73%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
50.71%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 22.36%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.