PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.08%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of PINS's 16.75%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
16.79%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of PINS's 21.27%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
36.44%
Positive EBIT growth while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
36.44%
Operating income growth under 50% of PINS's 87.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
40.47%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 334.38%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
44.44%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 334.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
38.89%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 335.66%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.52%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.49%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.59%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
11.10%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
291.36%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PINS's 310.48%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
291.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 217.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
126.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 46.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1162.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 424.98%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1162.91%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 592.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
415.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 69.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
158.17%
Similar net income/share CAGR to PINS's 166.88%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
158.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 133.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
401.93%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 188.03%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 50.13%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.36%
AR growth well above PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.05%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.65%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-19.89%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.17%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 8.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.14%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PINS's 22.36%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.