PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.60%
Revenue growth of 25.60% while PINS is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
27.94%
Gross profit growth of 27.94% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
43.54%
EBIT growth of 43.54% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
43.54%
Operating income growth of 43.54% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
-9.27%
Negative net income growth while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.26%
Negative EPS growth while PINS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PINS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.03%
Share reduction while PINS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.07%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.16%
OCF growth of 25.16% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
23.67%
FCF growth of 23.67% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
853.81%
10Y CAGR of 853.81% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
637.34%
5Y CAGR of 637.34% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
218.90%
3Y CAGR of 218.90% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1150.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 1150.68% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
914.70%
OCF/share CAGR of 914.70% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
358.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 358.70% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1075.27%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1075.27% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
8842.26%
Net income/share CAGR of 8842.26% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
480.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 480.54% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
1162.05%
Equity/share CAGR of 1162.05% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
469.81%
Equity/share CAGR of 469.81% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
94.99%
Equity/share CAGR of 94.99% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.83%
AR growth of 31.83% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.00%
Asset growth of 7.00% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
4.44%
BV/share growth of 4.44% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.02%
Our R&D shrinks while PINS invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
20.75%
SG&A growth of 20.75% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.