PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.57%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 22.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.74%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 29.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
7.60%
EBIT growth below 50% of PINS's 24.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.60%
Operating income growth under 50% of PINS's 24.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.39%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 27.13%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.33%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 28.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.96%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 28.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.49%
Share reduction while PINS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.36%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.86%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-43.74%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1139.17%
10Y CAGR of 1139.17% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
519.44%
5Y CAGR of 519.44% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
216.63%
3Y CAGR of 216.63% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
3993.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 3993.01% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
304.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 304.43% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
224.09%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 224.09% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1683.32%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1683.32% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1209.36%
Net income/share CAGR of 1209.36% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
590.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 590.77% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 445.63% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
94.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 94.63% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.29%
AR growth of 9.29% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.51%
Asset growth of 1.51% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
2.77%
BV/share growth of 2.77% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
23.47%
Debt growth of 23.47% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
12.73%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 2.59%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.86%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 11.17%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.