PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.75%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 17.99%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.65%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 22.60%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-1.40%
Negative EBIT growth while PINS is at 45.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.40%
Negative operating income growth while PINS is at 45.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.61%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 50.86%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.14%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 50.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.15%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 50.82%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.58%
Share reduction while PINS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.54%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.00%
OCF growth under 50% of PINS's 69.97%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
46.23%
FCF growth 50-75% of PINS's 64.85%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
1113.15%
10Y CAGR of 1113.15% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
486.74%
5Y CAGR of 486.74% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
198.07%
3Y CAGR of 198.07% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1018.59%
OCF/share CAGR of 1018.59% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
579.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 579.93% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
234.23%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 234.23% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1807.97%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1807.97% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
948.96%
Net income/share CAGR of 948.96% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
463.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 463.49% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
430.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 430.59% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
89.58%
Equity/share CAGR of 89.58% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.37%
AR growth of 8.37% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.39%
Asset growth of 2.39% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
1.80%
BV/share growth of 1.80% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-42.15%
We’re deleveraging while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.31%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 3.14%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
9.12%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 2.96%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.