PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.86%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-13.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-64.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-64.58%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-64.29%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.98%
Share reduction while PINS is at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.59%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.13%
OCF growth under 50% of PINS's 275.97%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
64.89%
FCF growth under 50% of PINS's 225.81%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1672.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 30.27%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
447.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 30.27%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
183.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 30.27%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2218.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 107.42%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
558.24%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 107.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
216.11%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 107.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
795.97%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 33.40% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
245.43%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 33.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
42.07%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 33.40%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
369.73%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
85.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while PINS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.66%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.48%
Positive asset growth while PINS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.86%
Positive BV/share change while PINS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1342.00%
Debt growth far above PINS's 7.24%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.18%
R&D dropping or stable vs. PINS's 8.99%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
76.71%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 6.63%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.