PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.89%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 62.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
16.27%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 100.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
34.83%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.17%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
34.83%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.17%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
51.53%
Net income growth above 1.5x PINS's 6.48%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
51.10%
EPS growth above 1.5x PINS's 5.88%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
50.56%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PINS's 5.88%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.50%
Share count expansion well above PINS's 0.36%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.56%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PINS's 2.86%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.43%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
885.39%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1811.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 77.30%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
369.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 77.30%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
112.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 77.30%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
1377.74%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
341.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
63.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2836.32%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
767.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
70.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.91%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 79.45%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
68.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 79.45%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.23%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. PINS's 61.61%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
Asset growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.29%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.07%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 1.10%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.80%
We have some new debt while PINS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
6.75%
R&D dropping or stable vs. PINS's 17.27%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
0.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PINS's 101.73%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.