PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.97%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-10.94%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-15.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-15.23%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-14.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.42%
Share reduction while PINS is at 1.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.38%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.81%
Negative OCF growth while PINS is at 168.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.46%
Negative FCF growth while PINS is at 176.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
2955.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 163.64%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
389.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 163.64%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
123.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 163.64%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
2928.23%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 1326.91%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
312.83%
Below 50% of PINS's 1326.91%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
59.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 1326.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
3378.45%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 70.65% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
451.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 70.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
94.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 70.65%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
185.16%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 80.88%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
76.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to PINS's 80.88%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.34%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.64%
Asset growth at 75-90% of PINS's 3.17%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.62%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 2.14%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
9.01%
We have some new debt while PINS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.21%
Our R&D shrinks while PINS invests at 4.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-8.49%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.