PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.28%
Revenue growth under 50% of PINS's 15.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.88%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 16.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-1.95%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.42%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-9.85%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-9.56%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.77%
Share reduction while PINS is at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.06%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.35%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-46.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1591.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 179.88%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
237.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 179.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
81.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 70.65%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
3402.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 292.02%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
148.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 292.02%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
50.52%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 262.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
3059.73%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 24.02% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
87.41%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 24.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
171.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 97.51%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
556.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 556.66% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
106.25%
Equity/share CAGR of 106.25% while PINS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
50.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 1.26%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.19%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. PINS's 8.13%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.39%
Asset growth at 75-90% of PINS's 3.82%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
2.85%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 0.36%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
14.33%
We have some new debt while PINS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
12.75%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 19.41%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
16.04%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 27.48%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.