PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.06%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PINS's 28.14%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
8.32%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 37.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
94.39%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 80.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
94.39%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 80.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
5.87%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 126.83%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.32%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 125.90%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.32%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 126.59%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.64%
Share reduction while PINS is at 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.75%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 0.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.74%
Positive OCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1630.38%
Positive FCF growth while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1946.82%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
177.59%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
65.65%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 82.93%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
2049.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 187.05%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
111.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 187.05%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
73.46%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 408.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
10814.15%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
22.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-31.26%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PINS is 140.84%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
978.66%
Positive growth while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
89.30%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
35.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to PINS's 35.23%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.94%
AR growth well above PINS's 33.36%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Asset growth at 75-90% of PINS's 4.62%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
2.99%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PINS's 0.87%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2.67%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PINS's 24.95%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
6.55%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 4.14%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
6.91%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PINS's 32.98%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.