PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.71%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of PINS's 7.79%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
7.22%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of PINS's 9.81%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
47.54%
EBIT growth 50-75% of PINS's 93.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
47.54%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of PINS's 93.17%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
48.73%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 119.27%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
48.51%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 119.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
47.32%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 118.92%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.31%
Slight or no buybacks while PINS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.11%
Diluted share count expanding well above PINS's 1.90%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.87%
OCF growth under 50% of PINS's 73.00%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
24.93%
FCF growth under 50% of PINS's 73.68%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1550.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 168.99%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
181.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PINS's 168.99%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
78.49%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 51.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1992.69%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 671.87%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
207.78%
Below 50% of PINS's 671.87%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
132.98%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 203.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
2574.63%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 123.91% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
154.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 123.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
65.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PINS's 106.29%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
966.99%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 129.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
101.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PINS's 129.07%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
36.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 27.65%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.46%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. PINS's 14.74%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.64%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 3.21%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
6.26%
1.25-1.5x PINS's 5.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-0.00%
We’re deleveraging while PINS stands at 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-1.10%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-32.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.