PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.47%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PINS's 28.57%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
16.04%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PINS's 35.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
24.10%
EBIT growth below 50% of PINS's 4025.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
24.10%
Operating income growth under 50% of PINS's 4025.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
21.01%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 2887.94%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
21.33%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 2870.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
21.41%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 2859.18%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.39%
Share reduction while PINS is at 0.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.42%
Reduced diluted shares while PINS is at 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.89%
Negative OCF growth while PINS is at 138.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.30%
Negative FCF growth while PINS is at 136.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1437.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 6.47%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
166.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 139.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
60.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 27.55%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1462.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 485.93%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
184.02%
Below 50% of PINS's 1013.35%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
55.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PINS's 135.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
2571.77%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 1011.63% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
129.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PINS's 184.82%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
40.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
881.35%
Positive growth while PINS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
104.77%
Below 50% of PINS's 251.22%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
34.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 26.42%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.92%
AR growth well above PINS's 22.26%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.17%
Asset growth at 50-75% of PINS's 8.77%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
7.62%
75-90% of PINS's 9.35%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
2.81%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PINS's 14.88%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
13.81%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 1.24%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.48%
SG&A growth well above PINS's 1.93%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.