PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.89%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PINS's 5.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
4.57%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of PINS's 6.29%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
16.86%
EBIT growth below 50% of PINS's 72.41%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
16.86%
Operating income growth under 50% of PINS's 72.41%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
16.51%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 243.83%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
16.76%
EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 246.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
16.86%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PINS's 251.20%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.20%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.38%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
27.64%
OCF growth under 50% of PINS's 133.05%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
47.06%
FCF growth under 50% of PINS's 140.17%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1218.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 212.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
161.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PINS's 158.53%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
57.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 34.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1960.90%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PINS's 1389.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
201.80%
Below 50% of PINS's 2571.11%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
98.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 42.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1934.91%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 207.05% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
192.61%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 119.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
92.65%
Positive short-term CAGR while PINS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
705.90%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 132.98%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
98.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 19.06%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
39.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PINS's 1.79%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.34%
AR growth well above PINS's 2.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.37%
Positive asset growth while PINS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.16%
Positive BV/share change while PINS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
29.10%
Debt growth far above PINS's 1.75%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
6.07%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PINS's 4.42%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-26.52%
We cut SG&A while PINS invests at 3.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.