PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.29%
Positive revenue growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.33%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
10.27%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
16.44%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
10.17%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.47%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
11.04%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.36%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.77%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while SNAP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
6.39%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-18.60%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1223.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 10775.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
190.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 155.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
77.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1430.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 171.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
653.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 214.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
125.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 169.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
2770.56%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
304.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 30.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
194.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 39.38%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
456.53%
Equity/share CAGR of 456.53% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
101.78%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
66.56%
Positive short-term equity growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.10%
AR growth well above SNAP's 0.63%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.19%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.80%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.08%
We have some new debt while SNAP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
6.52%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
12.01%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.