PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.91%
Positive revenue growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.61%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-295.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-295.01%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-176.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-230.42%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-230.42%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-12.12%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-12.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.12%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1325.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
72.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 10775.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
72.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 155.85%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
72.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
145.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 171.11%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
145.20%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 214.88%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
145.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 169.50%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
-185.50%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-185.50%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SNAP is 30.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-185.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SNAP is 39.38%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.55%
AR growth well above SNAP's 0.63%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.80%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
170.58%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
360.78%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
246.15%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.