PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.35%
Positive revenue growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
29.00%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
65.95%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
65.95%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
52.53%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
55.56%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
44.44%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.44%
Slight or no buybacks while SNAP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.12%
Slight or no buyback while SNAP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
168.88%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
100.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 10775.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
100.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 155.85%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
100.05%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
912.04%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 171.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
912.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 214.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
912.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 169.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
36.20%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
36.20%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 30.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
36.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to SNAP's 39.38%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.66%
AR growth well above SNAP's 0.63%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.70%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.99%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.41%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
16.62%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.