PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.22%
Positive revenue growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
38.77%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
46.47%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
46.47%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.22%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.53%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
17.65%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.32%
Slight or no buybacks while SNAP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.19%
Slight or no buyback while SNAP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.58%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
12.31%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
120.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 10775.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
120.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 155.85%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
120.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 17.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
133.08%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 171.11%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
133.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 214.88%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
133.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 169.50%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
66.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
66.27%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 30.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
66.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 39.38%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
204.94%
Equity/share CAGR of 204.94% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
204.94%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
204.94%
Positive short-term equity growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.18%
AR growth well above SNAP's 0.63%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.84%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
17.02%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-17.22%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.57%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
36.88%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.