PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.36%
Revenue growth under 50% of SNAP's 215.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
12.06%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
14.61%
EBIT growth of 14.61% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
14.61%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
24.62%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.08%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
24.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.45%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SNAP's 2.58%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.46%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SNAP's 2.58%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.60%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
6.09%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
307.00%
10Y CAGR of 307.00% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
307.00%
5Y CAGR of 307.00% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
203.16%
3Y CAGR of 203.16% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
234.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 234.68% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
234.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 234.68% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
645.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 645.29% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
238.60%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 238.60% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
238.60%
Net income/share CAGR of 238.60% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
1383.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 1383.66% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 148.39% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.74%
AR growth of 10.74% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.30%
Asset growth of 5.30% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
4.51%
BV/share growth of 4.51% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-15.44%
We’re deleveraging while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
8.63%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SNAP's 10.02%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
12.89%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 8.92%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.