PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.93%
Revenue growth under 50% of SNAP's 78.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.13%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SNAP's 101.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
14.01%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.01%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.11%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.28%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.49%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.38%
Share change of 0.38% while SNAP is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.34%
Diluted share change of 0.34% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.85%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
12.66%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
517.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 455.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
517.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 455.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
198.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 455.12%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
431.91%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
431.91%
Positive OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
223.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
869.72%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 6.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
869.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 6.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
433.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 6.92%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
256.14%
Equity/share CAGR of 256.14% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.60%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SNAP's 79.60%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.00%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.19%
R&D dropping or stable vs. SNAP's 51.34%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.97%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SNAP's 35.15%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.