PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.65%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of SNAP's 29.23%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
28.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SNAP's 2808.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
46.52%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
46.52%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
35.88%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
49.40%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
47.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.25%
Share change of 0.25% while SNAP is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.24%
Diluted share change of 0.24% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.82%
OCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 22.66%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
47.50%
FCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 19.64%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
552.73%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 276.97%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
552.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 276.97%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
195.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 276.97%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
710.12%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
710.12%
Positive OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
247.57%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
887.91%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
887.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
494.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
912.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 47.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
912.61%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 47.97%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
232.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 47.97%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.07%
AR growth well above SNAP's 32.41%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.86%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
9.11%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
R&D dropping or stable vs. SNAP's 19.06%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
19.81%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SNAP's 52.42%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.