PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.05%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 21.40%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
17.62%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SNAP's 315.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
32.28%
EBIT growth below 50% of SNAP's 80.02%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
32.28%
Operating income growth under 50% of SNAP's 79.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
27.17%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 79.94%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
26.42%
EPS growth under 50% of SNAP's 84.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
26.92%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SNAP's 84.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.30%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SNAP's 28.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.24%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SNAP's 28.11%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.97%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
3.41%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
767.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 1911.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
401.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 1911.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
183.05%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 1911.06%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
3361.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1311.73%
Positive OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
253.21%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1250.34%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1679.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
336.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 218.39% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
220.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 220.23% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.11%
AR growth well above SNAP's 16.15%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.46%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.59%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.04%
We expand SG&A while SNAP cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.