PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.80%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 14.46%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
9.85%
Positive gross profit growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.38%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
16.38%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
20.93%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.90%
EPS growth of 20.90% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
20.45%
Diluted EPS growth of 20.45% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.21%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SNAP's 0.78%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SNAP's 0.78%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.33%
OCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 7.43%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
11.67%
FCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.93%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
800.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 642.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
570.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 642.43%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
187.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 642.43%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
801.72%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1908.01%
Positive OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
337.30%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1622.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
6631.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
422.36%
Positive short-term CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
311.55%
Equity/share CAGR of 311.55% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
198.60%
Equity/share CAGR of 198.60% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.52%
AR growth well above SNAP's 13.67%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.98%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.89%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.93%
We increase R&D while SNAP cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-3.29%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.