PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.60%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 37.39%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
27.94%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SNAP's 3505.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
43.54%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SNAP's 22.49%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
43.54%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SNAP's 21.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-9.27%
Negative net income growth while SNAP stands at 21.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.26%
Negative EPS growth while SNAP is at 22.22%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SNAP is at 22.22%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.03%
Share reduction while SNAP is at 0.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.07%
Reduced diluted shares while SNAP is at 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.16%
OCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 9.24%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
23.67%
FCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 10.39%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
853.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 431.13%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
637.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 431.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
218.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 431.13%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
1150.68%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
914.70%
Positive OCF/share growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
358.70%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1075.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
8842.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
480.54%
Positive short-term CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1162.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 138.19%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
469.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 138.19%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
94.99%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 138.19%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.83%
AR growth well above SNAP's 43.34%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.00%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.44%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.02%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
20.75%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 0.89%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.